Click to connect with us on LinkedIn or Facebook | Office: (011) 888-7944

06
Dec

0

POTENTIAL RETRENCHEES ENTITLED TO REPRESENTATION

When an employer contemplates retrenching employees it must have a good reason for going through with such an idea. Reasons for retrenchment that are not acceptable include the employer’s personal dislike of the employee, a desire to replace the employee with a family member, the employee’s misconduct, poor performance, population group, state of pregnancy or […]

21
Mar

0

DISMISSING ALCOHOLICS/ADDICTS CAN BE COSTLY

It is legally very dangerous for employers to to discipline and fire employees who commit offences due to illness or disability. For example, an employee who uses alcohol or narcotics and becomes addicted is legally classified as being ill and is protected by law.   Section 6 of the Employment Equity Act prohibits unfair discrimination […]

14
Mar

0

THE LABOUR DISPUTE SYSTEM – HOW IT WORKS

The Labour Relations Act of 1995 (LRA) makes it very easy for employees to challenge alleged unfair dismissals and other unfair practices at private or statutory dispute resolution forums. Such disputes may, by agreement, be dealt with via private (non-statutory) dispute resolution forums such as AMSA, AFSA, Tokiso and others. On the other hand the […]

22
Feb

0

BEWARE OF RETRENCHMENTS FOR POOR PERFORMANCE

The legal procedures that an employer is required to follow in implementing dismissals for misconduct, retrenchments and poor work performance are all different. For instance, it is not normally acceptable to use the procedure laid down for retrenchments in order to deal with poor work performance.   However, while retrenchments and poor performance terminations should […]

08
Feb

0

POOR CONDUCT CAN MEAN POOR MANAGEMENT

Occasionally employees misbehave or misperform because they do not want to work and prefer to get fired. However, in my experience this is more the exception than the rule. More often, consistent poor conduct or poor performance reflects a management that is either under skilled or unwilling to manage employee conduct. As a result we […]

07
Dec

0

FIRING THE LOT COULD PUT YOU IN A SPOT

Employers frequently suspect that serious misconduct has occurred but are unable to prove which employee or employees are responsible. Some case law has given the impression that, in such circumstances, group dismissals may be justified. This impression has been given by two important cases; those involving Score Supermarkets and Snip Trading. In the case of […]

02
Nov

0

WORKPLACE WHISTLE BLOWERS ARE WELL PROTECTED

Employees who report employers for committing illegal or otherwise irregular acts are protected, in the first instance, by the Constitution of South Africa. Specifically, section 16 of the Bill of Rights gives everyone the right to freedom of expression and to impart information.   Secondly, the Protected Disclosures Act no.26 of 2000 (PDA) specifically protects […]

19
Oct

0

CCMA GUIDELINES ON MISCONDUCT CRUCIAL

Early last year I informed readers of the CCMA’s decision to draft a set of guidelines on Misconduct Arbitrations in terms of the provisions of the Labour Relations Act (LRA). These guidelines were implemented in January 2012. The stated purpose of these guidelines is to “…promote consistent decision making in arbitrations dealing with dismissals for […]

12
Oct

0

NEDLAC PROCESS BESET BY CONFLICTING AGENDAS

‘NEDLAC’ stands for the National Economic Development and Labour Council. This is a high level forum where, amongst other things, legislation regarding labour and economic development issues is debated and formed in preparation for enactment in Parliament. This body therefore has a major responsibility to arrive at proposals for legislation that will promote economic development […]

Page 1 of 2