Home › Forums › Labour Law Debate › RETIREMENT OR RETRENCHMENT? › Reply To: RETIREMENT OR RETRENCHMENT?
28th November 2020 at 1:07 pm
#11888
Michael Bagraim
Keymaster
The very reason given by the employer shows that in fact it was a retrenchment.
Once people have passed their retirement age, you can’t willy nilly invoke the retirement clause retrospectively.
To invoke Section 187(2) is the same as claiming that it was a retirement, in other words the argument is merely repeated.
MICHAEL BAGRAIM